Search NoeHill   Contact NoeHill  
NoeHill.com
  Home    San Francisco    California    The West    The World Visit NoeHill on Facebook Visit NoeHill on Twitter  
 
 
  
 California Intro
 California Map
  
 Alameda
 Alpine
 Amador
 Butte
 Calaveras
 Colusa
 Contra Costa
 Del Norte
 El Dorado
 Fresno
 Glenn
 Humboldt
 Imperial
 Inyo
 Kern
 Kings
 Lake
 Lassen
 Los Angeles
 Madera
 Marin
 Mariposa
 Mendocino
 Merced
 Modoc
 Mono
 Monterey
 Napa
 Nevada
 Orange
 Placer
 Plumas
 Riverside
 Sacramento
 San Benito
 San Bernardino
 San Diego
 San Francisco
 San Joaquin
 San Luis Obispo
 San Mateo
 Santa Barbara
 Santa Clara
 Santa Cruz
 Shasta
 Sierra
 Siskiyou
 Solano
 Sonoma
 Stanislaus
 Sutter
 Tehama
 Trinity
 Tulare
 Tuolumne
 Ventura
 Yolo
 Yuba
California Historical Landmarks Versus National Register Historic Places
 
A California Historical Landmark A California Historical Landmark
(Lake County)
22 May 2005
 
A National Register Historic Place A National Register Historic Place
(Carnegie Library in Patterson)
16 June 2006
The National Register lists historic places. San Francisco lists landmarks and historic districts. The California Office of Historic Preservation lists historical landmarks.

When I cite one of these lists, I alway have to check to see whether to type historic or historical.

Are the two words synonymous?

No, says Grammar Girl. Historic describes something important or influential in the past. Historical is anything from the past no matter how trivial. Grammar Girl offers the example of an historical novel versus an historic book such as the Gutenberg Bible. (This raises the issue of a historic book versus an historic book, but we won't go there.)

Grammar Monster concurs with Grammar Girl.

Perhaps I make too much of the distinction. Even the experts can be careless. The website for the National Register of Historic Places consistently displays National Register of Historical Places in the title bar at the top of the browser window.